Cap and Trade Rules
Boxer Says Senate Will ‘Follow the Science’ on Global Warming Legislation

By Ryan Byrnes
February 04, 2009

Sen. Barbara Boxer (D-Calif.) chairwoman of the Senate Environment and Public
Works Committee. (AP photo)(CNSNews.com) - Democratic members of the Senate
Environment and Public Works Committee have pledged to “follow science” in their
quest to quell the effects of global warming, even as some reports suggest that
belief in the environmental threat is waning.

Sen. Barbara Boxer (D-Calif.), the committee chair, told reporters at a Capitol
Hill news conference Tuesday that Democrats on the committee are writing a
global warming bill that she says will not only preserve the environment, but
also help remedy the nation’s economic problems.

“Don’t allow talk of an economic recession to stop our work,” Boxer said. “The
surest way to create good jobs in this country is to mobilize for clean energy.”

Boxer said she does not agree with economists who say taxes are the most
effective way to reduce carbon emissions.
She reaffirmed support for a cap-and-trade emissions system, though there is
disagreement on the committee regarding whether that is the best option, she said.

“We’re working, let’s be clear, on cap-and-trade programs,” Boxer said. “The
whole world is doing cap-and-trade, so we need to be consistent.”

Under cap-and trade, government sets a cap on the amount of a pollutant that can
be emitted, and companies that exceed the cap are allowed to trade or purchase
credits from companies that pollute less.

Boxer outlined the principles that will guide the committee in drafting a
global-warming bill: setting short- and long-term emission targets that are
certain and enforceable, establishing a transparent and accountable market-based
system to reduce carbon emissions, and not setting specific numerical goals for
carbon reduction but letting science dictate policy.

“Science will guide us, period,” she said. “Science will guide our committee and
we will have a robust debate on what that science says.”

But the committee’s ranking Republican, Sen. James Inhofe (R-Okla.), who fought
similar legislation in the committee last year, warned that the global warming
bill that is being readied should be examined closely.

“When it comes to drafting comprehensive climate legislation, the devil is in
the details,” Inhofe said in a statement.

The committee’s principles offer “nothing more than a punt on all of the
difficult issues that Americans expect to be honestly debated,” he added.

In his 2008 annual report, Inhofe suggested that cap-and-trade legislation could
lead to a multitude of problems, including higher gas prices and a loss of
manufacturing jobs.

“Congressional cap-and-trade bills, often touted as an ‘insurance policy’
against global warming, would instead be nothing more than all economic pain for
no climate gain,” Inhofe said.

Inhofe, meanwhile, issued a minority report last month that quoted 650 top
scientists who challenge the claim that global warming is man-made.

More than a dozen additional scientists have publicly expressed their skepticism
since the report’s release, including a former NASA supervisor who said climate
fears “embarrassed NASA.”

Many of the scientists, like Dutch atmospheric scientist Dr. Hendrik Tennekes,
dismiss out of hand the global warming theory, Inhofe reported.

“I find the doomsday picture Al Gore is painting--a six-meter sea level rise,
fifteen times the IPCC number--entirely without merit,” said Tennekes, who is
the former director of research at The Netherlands’ Royal National
Meteorological Institute.

“I protest vigorously the idea that the climate reacts like a home heating
system to a changed setting of the thermostat: just turn the dial, and the
desired temperature will soon be reached."

Boxer, who is committed to getting a bill out of committee by the end of the
year, said she was confident global-warming legislation would gain bipartisan

“I know there will be [bipartisan support] because we had it last year,” Boxer
added, though she would not specify which Republicans supported previous legislation.


Promoting Green Building Design, Construction and Operation, Sustainable Living,
Clean Technology, Renewable Energy Resources and Energy Independence