|What Carbon Regulation Means for Energy Investors|
By Nick Hodge
February 25, 2009
"It begins with energy."
That's how Obama introduced his budget last night in an address to a joint
session of Congress. And where the Federal dollars go, so should your portfolio.
The hour-long address was rife with references to energy, each of which could
have profitable investment implications.
As he trumpeted during the campaign, renewable energy seems to be a large part
of his plan. "We know the country that harnesses the power of clean, renewable
energy will lead the 21st century," he said.
In fact, the only two times he mentioned oil was to tell us our future as a
nation depends on using less of it:
We have known for decades that our survival depends on finding new sources of
energy. Yet we import more oil today than ever before.
The only way this century will be another American century is if we confront at
last the price of our dependence on oil. . .
That confrontation could prove very profitable for energy investors.
But it's not just his planned battle against oil dependence that will spur
profits, he's also declared war on rising carbon emissions. And we all know that
wars are profitable.
Calling for Carbon Caps
Other than mandating its use, capping carbon emissions is the next best thing to
spur wide scale adoption of renewable energy. A cap-and-trade program instantly
makes carbon a liability, thereby driving up the cost of burning fossil fuels to
generate electricity or using carbon-intensive boilers to power energy-hungry
What that means is renewable energy instantly become more competitive, if not
A utility is much more likely to build a wind or solar farm than construct a new
coal plant if they know the coal plant comes with exorbitant lifetime carbon costs.
Remember this Obama quote from January a year ago? "So, if somebody wants to
build a coal plant, they can - it's just that it will bankrupt them, because
they are going to be charged a huge sum for all that greenhouse gas that's being emitted."
The industrial sector, too, would be more apt to cover their roofs with solar
rather than use soon-to-be costly boilers and generators.
The idea here is to make renewables cost-competitive with traditional resources
in an attempt to spur demand for clean energy and set us on a sustainable
trajectory both economically and ecologically.
For investors, it means having to switch investment strategies to adapt to the
changing dynamic of the energy market as we know it. It's a transition that, if
understood and acted on, can make smart investors a lot of money.
Here's what the president asked for last night:
But to truly transform our economy, protect our security, and save our planet
from the ravages of climate change, we need to ultimately make clean, renewable
energy the profitable kind of energy. So I ask this Congress to send me
legislation that places a market- based cap on carbon pollution and drives the
production of more renewable energy in America. And to support that innovation,
we will invest fifteen billion dollars a year to develop technologies like wind
power and solar power; advanced biofuels, clean coal, and more fuel-efficient
cars and trucks built right here in America.
He's telling you the industries that are about to receive direct federal
investment, and a de facto competitive advantage. Long-term winners are being
created, all you have to do is place your bet and wait. Recently sagging stock
prices should present the perfect opportunity to do that.
Small Cap Wizard Reveals Little-Known Secret to Easy Money
Ian Cooper has found a way to safely pull in triple-digit winner after
triple-digit winner in an otherwise dangerous small-cap sector.His
off-the-charts accuracy for reliably reading the markets, matched with his
winner-after-winner track record, has plastered his sought-after advice on the
pages of numerous publications. He's filled columns from Investor's Business
Daily all the way to Forbes.
He's also frequently appeared on investment shows such as Money Matters with
Barry Armstrong and On the Money with Mike Stein.
Cap-and-Trade with All the Fixin's
Calling for cap-and-trade comes with many profitable side dishes for those on
the right side of the play. It's another story for those about to receive a
ladle full of liability.
For starters, it means immediately expanding the use of renewable energy, which
means lucrative investments in solar and wind and in the infrastructure
companies that support those industries.
It also means major improvements to our aging grid—higher capacity, two-way
communication intelligence, and increased transmission to move
remotely-generated renewable electricity to populated areas.
The recently-passed stimulus had many provisions to that end, and Obama
addressed them both last night:
Thanks to our recovery plan, we will double this nation's supply of renewable
energy in the next three years.
We will soon lay down thousands of miles of power lines that can carry new
energy to cities and towns across this country. And we will put Americans to
work making our homes and buildings more efficient so that we can save billions
of dollars on our energy bills.
Even the Republican response by Bobby Jindal touched on the issue positively,
saying, " we need to increase conservation, increase energy efficiency, increase
the use of alternative and renewable fuels. . ."
Even Obama's campaign rival and well known Republican John McCain supports a
cap-and-trade program. And according to house minority leader John Boehner,
about a dozen republicans support the measure, which is more than enough to
ensure passage in the Senate. The house, as we saw with the stimulus, doesn't
even need a Republican vote to ram through legislation.
These things are happening in a very real way, and at a very rapid pace. And
it's not just the government leading the charge, private capital is doing its
fair share as well, and will continue to do so now that billions worth of
renewable energy tax incentives have been included in the stimulus.
Venture activity in renewables, for example, has climbed by 1,500% since 2003,
from $271 million to $4.1 billion. And new tax provisions are aimed at keeping
that flow coming.
This transition is happening. Just as utilities are busy mitigating their carbon
risk, you should be diligently doing to same, as well as increasing or
establishing positions in cleantech growth stocks.
Of course you should own First Solar (NASDAQ: FSLR), especially after their slip
And holding a broad cleantech ETF like the Market Vectors Global Alternative
Energy (NYSE: GEX) is also a no-brainer given its exceptional exposure to global
wind, solar, and efficiency companies.
I know the current market climate is bad, to say the least. But we have to place
our bets now on the sectors and companies that will be the first to emerge from
With billions of federal dollars now at their back, and a very favorable
regulatory regime to follow, it's pretty obvious who those winners will be.
Yet there's plenty of remaining turmoil. And from turmoil comes large profits.
Buying and holding the big boys of cleantech on current dips is a great
long-term strategy. But knowing the nuances of the industry—the small companies
about to make a big impact—can earn you even higher returns.
That's what the Alternative Energy Speculator does every week. Thousands of
readers enjoy stock recommendations, buy and sell prices, and full analysis on
Our most recent opportunity stems from the stimulus, and the billions it will
pour into cleantech. Take a moment to read about it. It could be a very
profitable 10 minutes for you given the current direction of the domestic energy market.