Home
Primers
 
Back
 
The Greenest Building…


By Jennifer Berry
Earth911.com
February 23, 2009


…is the one that’s already built, according to the Trust for Architectural
Easements (TAE), one of the largest preservation easement holding organizations
in the nation. The organization protects over 800 historical buildings in the
U.S. The “greenest building” concept was first described in these terms by Carl
Elefante.

But what does this concept mean? Aren’t new green buildings the way of the
future?

According to TAE, “The Pew Center on Global Climate Change estimates that 43
percent of carbon emissions in the United States are attributable to energy used
in residential, commercial and industrial buildings, making the building sector
the largest source of greenhouse gases in America. This figure does not even
include the energy required to build new structures or to demolish established structures.”

As much as new green buildings are the boon to our continued interest in
sustainable development, there is a great deal of misunderstanding in what is
lost when older buildings are demolished in the name of progress. The main loss
is what is known as “embodied energy,” the concept encompassing “the sum of all
of the efforts in the building of the structure itself: the harvesting of
organic resources plus the manufacturing development (making those materials
into building materials), transportation and the building itself,” according to
Lindsey Wallace, donor relations assistant for the TAE. “With new construction,
you have to make all that, and it creates a lot of waste.”

The crucial element in the loss of embodied energy is that it cannot be
regained. Granted, building salvage businesses are alive and well, but on the
whole, a great deal of energy, carbon emissions, materials, time and labor are
gone when a building is taken down.

According to Richard Moe, president for the National Trust for Historic
Preservation, “Demolishing a 50,000 square foot building creates 4,000 tons of
waste, enough to fill 26 box cars – a train one-quarter mile long.”

Additionally, “Constructing a new 50,000 square foot building releases as much
carbon as driving a car 2.8 million miles.”

TAE also reports, “The Brookings Institution estimates that, at current rates,
one third of the existing building stock in the United States will be demolished
in the next 25 years. The refuse from construction, primarily from demolition,
represents approximately 25 percent of the waste added to our landfills each year.”

New Vs. Old

“We’re not completely forgetting that new construction is ‘green,’ but it should
be pointed out that some studies show that the rehab of a historic structure
achieves the same energy efficiency,” said Heather Massler, director of
operations and stewardship for TAE. When it comes to the environmental benefits
of rehabilitating and retrofitting older structures, you may be surprised at
your energy savings.

According to Moe, “It takes approximately 65 years for a green, energy-efficient
building to recover the energy lost in demolition of an existing building even
if 40 percent of the building materials from the demolition are recycled.”
A classic example of a reused, rehabilitated building is when an old factory
(for example) is converted into loft apartments. Rather than tearing down the
older structure and replacing it with a new high rise, the integrity of the
structure itself remains (many people, in fact, enjoy the scuffed, burned or
nicked floors and walls of buildings like these for their “character”) and the
resources used to complete it in the first place are intact.

Massler also pointed out that if you’re looking to update your existing home,
reaching for older materials is also a savings in energy. “Your choices are
about consumption. Can I live with what I have, or does this really need to be
replaced? Why rip out old floors to replace them with new bamboo? Old buildings
usually have really durable materials, and there’s a whole salvage world out there.”

One With Nature

Another important consideration for older buildings is their use of the site on
which they were constructed, or as Wallace put it, “taking advantage of how
people have built for thousands of years.”

“Historic buildings already use the natural resources as much as possible [...]
Several studies have shown that with proper repair and upkeep, they can be just
as energy efficient,” said Massler.

Historic buildings typically have high ceilings, transoms and large windows for
light and ventilation. Site selection and placement on the site, as well as
porches and the use of landscaping, contribute to the efficient use of energy,
according to TAE.

“People used to think about the site more, because modern conveniences weren’t
already in place,” said Massler.

Along these lines, TAE reports that, “Data from the U.S. Energy Information
Agency indicates that structures built prior to 1920 are more energy-efficient
than those built through the year 2000, when the concept of sustainability began
to take hold.”

Additionally, the General Services Administration estimates that the utility
costs for historic buildings in its inventory are 27 percent less than for
modern structures.

Economic Centers

Who knew older buildings used less average energy than their modern
counterparts? Photo: Preservationnation.org“As economist Donovan Rypkema has
pointed out, preserving a building is equal to preserving land,” said Wallace.
“When preserving buildings in an urban center, you’re discouraging sprawl. The
focus on building rehab is about reinvesting in urban centers.”

“When we think of sustainable development, with preservation and rehabilitation,
it also speaks to culture and economic sustainability which isn’t talked about
as much, but is still as important,” said Massler. “If you are rehab-ing any
building in a city, the labor costs are a lot more than the actual materials,
helping provide jobs. For example, Rypkema said that if you spend more money on
the labor, you’re spending more money for the economy, because the laborer will
spend the money again.”

“The preservation community has been advocating for federal tax credits for
rehab-ing for exactly this issue, especially for retrofits - using resources
already there, specialized labor that pays better, they put people back to
work,” said Wallace.

LEEDing on

The National Trust for Historic Preservation and a number of other
organizations, are working with the U.S. Green Building Council (the council
responsible for the LEED program) to incorporate more preservation aspects in
LEED certification. In fact, the new 2009 LEED Green Building Rating Systems
will reflect the sustainable benefits of historic preservation.

But what can you do in the meantime? Even if you don’t have a big preservation
project in the works, little steps in your own home still make a big difference.
According to Wallace, “small efforts like weather stripping, really do add to
your energy savings.” Massler also added that, “Most people want to be green or
want to help out in whatever way they can. Just thinking about it and being
aware is the first step.”

 

Promoting Green Building Design, Construction and Operation, Sustainable Living,
Clean Technology, Renewable Energy Resources and Energy Independence